Karşılaştırma
Airtable vs Notion
Özetle
Özetle
Seçin
Şu durumda Airtable…
- Your data is genuinely relational: records that link to other records, rolled-up fields, and views that each team filters differently rather than one shared page everyone scrolls.
- Another tool will read from it. Airtable is the backend Softr and Glide are built to sit on, and it is wired into both Zapier and Make out of the box.
- You need several views of the same records, a grid for operations, a calendar for the content team, a board for delivery, without duplicating the underlying data three times.
- Automations should live next to the data. Record-triggered automations inside the base replace a class of work that would otherwise become paid tasks in an automation tool.
- You are willing to keep documentation elsewhere. Airtable is a weak place to write anything longer than a field description, and pretending otherwise is the usual regret.
Seçin
Şu durumda Notion…
- The work is mostly writing: specs, wikis, meeting notes and handbooks, with a tracker attached, rather than the other way round.
- You want one workspace instead of three subscriptions. Docs, project boards and lightweight databases in a single tool is the whole reason teams consolidate onto Notion.
- Per-seat cost matters and everyone needs an account. Notion's paid entry tier is cheaper per seat than Airtable's in our data, and its free plan carries real personal use.
- Structure should be able to appear later. A Notion page can become a database when the need shows up, which suits teams that do not yet know their schema.
- People will use it on a phone as often as a laptop, and you want the same editing experience in both places.
Özellik özelliğe
Özellik özelliğe
| Özellik | Airtable | Notion |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | 20 | 10 ✓ |
| Free tier | Evet | Evet |
| Learning curve | no_code | no_code |
| Rating | 4.9 ✓ | 4.6 |
| Reviews | 0 | 0 |
| Integrations | 4 ✓ | 3 |
| API access | Evet | Evet |
| Mobile app | Evet | Evet |
| Multilingual | Evet | Evet |
| Data export | Evet | Evet |
| Team collaboration | Evet | Evet |
| Templates | Evet | Evet |
| AI features | Evet | Evet |
| Support tier | priority | priority |
Fiyatlandırma
Fiyatlar, yan yana
Değerlendirmemiz
İhtiyacınıza bağlı
Airtable ile Notion sürekli karşılaştırılır ama aynı probleme zıt uçlardan girerler. Airtable, belge katmanı sonradan eklenmiş bir veritabanıdır: yapılandırılmış kayıtlar, görünümler ve ilişkilerle başlarsınız, yazı sonra gelir. Notion ise veritabanı katmanı sonradan eklenmiş bir belge aracıdır: sayfalar ve wiki ile başlarsınız, yapı ancak bir sayfa tabloya dönüştüğünde ortaya çıkar. Gerçek kararı belirleyen fark budur. Kayıtlarınız birbiriyle ilişkilenecekse ve veriyi başka araçlar okuyacaksa, Airtable daha sağlam bir temeldir; Softr ve Glide zaten onun üzerine oturmak için tasarlanmıştır. Kurduğunuz şey aslında bilgi ise ve yanına bir takip tablosu gerekiyorsa, Notion her şeyi tek yerde tutar ve giriş seviyesinde kullanıcı başına daha ucuzdur. Yanlış ucu seçen ekipler bunu bir çeyrek içinde fark eder.
Son inceleme August 2026
FAQ
SSS
- Can Notion replace Airtable as the backend for other no-code tools?
- Usually not, and this is the sharpest practical difference between them. Softr and Glide are built to read Airtable bases, and Airtable appears as a native integration in both Zapier and Make. Notion has an API and connects to plenty of tools, but the no-code app builders in this directory treat Airtable as a first-class data source in a way they do not treat Notion. If the plan is to put a portal, a client app or a mobile front end over your data, choosing Notion means accepting a smaller set of tools that will read it.
- Which one is cheaper?
- Notion's paid entry tier is cheaper per seat than Airtable's in our data, and both keep a free plan, so on paper Notion wins. In practice the bill is decided by how many people need write access and how many records you keep. Airtable prices in seats and in record limits per base, which makes a large read-heavy dataset expensive even when only two people edit it. Notion prices in seats alone, so a big wiki with a small editing team stays cheap. Model your own seat count before trusting either headline number.
- Do teams actually run both?
- Often, and it is not always a mistake. The common split is Notion for anything written, such as specs, wikis and meeting notes, and Airtable for anything a machine will read: content calendars that feed a publishing automation, inventories, records shaped like a CRM. The cost is that two tools now hold overlapping truth, so pick one as the source of record for each type of object and link across rather than copying. Teams that skip that step maintain the same list twice and end up trusting neither copy.
- Which is easier to learn?
- Notion is easier to start and harder to keep tidy; Airtable is the reverse. Anyone can write a Notion page on day one, but a workspace with no conventions turns into a search problem within months, which is the complaint that shows up most often in Notion reviews. Airtable asks you to think about fields and relations before you get any value, and that up-front friction is exactly what keeps the base legible a year later. Neither of them needs code.
- What should I do if I have already outgrown one of them?
- Outgrowing Airtable usually means you need a real relational database rather than a different spreadsheet, and that is a developer conversation rather than a no-code one. Outgrowing Notion usually means you needed structure all along, and the migration is more forgiving because the content moves as documents. Before either move, check whether the problem is the tool or the absence of an owner: most workspaces described as a mess have nobody responsible for the schema.